Copper changes the mix for BHP, but iron still rules
- Copper now provides just over half of group earnings, shifting the profit mix.
- Iron ore remains the main cash engine, led by low unit costs at WAIO.
- Jansen potash costs continue to climb, forcing a $2.3 billion impairment on Stage 2.
- BHP approved $0.9 billion for the Ministers North iron ore project to sustain volumes.
- Western Australia Nickel operations are now under review for potential divestment.
A copper pivot funded by iron
The bull case focuses on a copper-led future. Copper now accounts for just over half of earnings. BHP is pushing forward with the Escondida New Concentrator and the Vicuna joint venture, which just secured major tax benefits in Argentina.
The company is also unlocking cash from existing assets. Recent deals, including an Antamina silver stream and a power agreement, brought in $6.3 billion without selling core operations.
The bear case centers on rising project costs and iron ore risks. Demand for iron ore relies heavily on China. More importantly, the Jansen potash project is struggling with capital intensity. Stage 2 costs jumped by $2.0 billion to $6.9 billion, causing a $2.3 billion impairment in FY2026.
The next proof points are clear. Watch the Vicuna Stage 1 investment decision expected by the end of 2026, and the outcome of the Western Australia Nickel review by early 2027.
Big mines, low unit costs
BHP makes money by running very large mines for basic materials. The best assets sit low on the cost curve. This means they can generate cash even when commodity prices fall. WAIO leads globally with unit costs around $17.66 per tonne.
Scale matters in mining. A massive port, rail, and processing system spreads fixed costs over huge volumes. To maintain capacity above 305 million tonnes per year, BHP recently approved the $0.9 billion Ministers North project.
The model suffers when project spending runs out of control or when structural oversupply hits. The company had to suspend Western Australia Nickel and take impairments because of global oversupply and falling prices.
What BHP digs up
Iron ore
Iron ore is the core cash generator. The new Ministers North project will help sustain long-term production levels.
Copper
Copper is the main growth engine and now provides over half of earnings. Escondida and the Vicuna joint venture lead the pipeline.
Potash
Jansen is a massive bet on crop nutrients. Cost overruns have hurt the project, pushing Stage 2 costs up and forcing a major write-down.
Coal
Coal is shrinking as a portion of the business. BHP sold Blackwater and Daunia, leaving a smaller footprint.
Nickel
Nickel shows the danger of commodity cycles. BHP suspended Western Australia Nickel and is reviewing it for potential divestment by February 2027.
Still a two-pillar business
The mix uses FY2025 segment revenue from BHP filings. Copper and iron ore together make up most revenue, while potash has little to no revenue before Jansen starts production.
What can break the thesis
China iron ore slowdown
High impact · Medium oddsBHP still relies on iron ore for a huge share of cash flow. A weaker China property or infrastructure cycle can cut steel demand and pull iron ore prices lower. Low costs help, but they cannot entirely offset a large price drop.
Jansen cost creep
High impact · Medium oddsJansen is meant to build a new potash pillar. The problem is severe capital intensity. Stage 1 costs climbed to $8.4 billion, and Stage 2 costs recently blew out by $2.0 billion, forcing a $2.3 billion impairment.
Sticky mining inflation
Medium impact · High oddsMining requires workers, fuel, contractors, and equipment. Inflation has pushed WAIO C1 costs slightly higher. If labor and contractor costs stay high, margins will narrow even at the best assets.
Commodity oversupply
Medium impact · Medium oddsBHP already felt this in nickel. Global oversupply forced the suspension of Western Australia Nickel, which is now up for potential divestment. A similar supply wave in copper or potash could hurt returns.
Legacy liability shocks
Medium impact · Low oddsBHP reduced uncertainty by signing a comprehensive agreement for the Samarco dam failure. That does not make legacy risk disappear entirely. Large mining liabilities can still require cash payments.
In one breath
Is BHP mainly an iron ore company?
Iron ore is still a massive cash source. However, copper has become much more important, producing just over half of earnings in a recent half.
Why does BHP care so much about copper?
Copper is used in power grids, data centers, and electric vehicles. BHP expects long-term demand to grow faster than for older commodities.
What is the Jansen potash project?
Jansen is a large fertilizer project in Canada. It has suffered severe cost overruns, with Stage 1 costs reaching $8.4 billion and Stage 2 taking a $2.3 billion impairment.
What should investors watch next for BHP?
Watch the Vicuna Stage 1 investment decision, WAIO costs, Jansen execution, and the final decision on divesting the nickel business.
Sources and research notes
This page combines Finn's company research with public filings and other cited materials. The thesis is reviewed when material company information changes; Finn Scores use the latest available scoring data.
- Thesis reviewed
- September 13, 2026
- Score data
- September 27, 2026
- Reviewed by
- Shivam Bharuka
Comparable Other Industrial Metals & Mining companies
Companies near BHP Group Limited in Finn's Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry ranking.

